I’ve been a Direct Marketing person for a long time, and I like my marketing measurements pretty tangible: “number of people responding to my message,” “total sales per person,” “number of buyers per household,” “return on marketing investment,” and so forth. Measurements like GRPs and Pass-Along Copies always seemed pretty squishy to me – it always seemed like someone was getting fooled, yet no one really got upset about it! I was secretly delighted the other day to read Forrester’s David Cooperstein write (in his January 15th article “The Future of Media Measurement, Preparing for a Convergence of Measurement across Channels”):
Read the full article.
In Part 1, I discussed the data issues surrounding the integration of online and offline data (fifthgearanalytics.com/1stentry). It’s making it increasingly difficult to get the marketing analytics we need to attribute success to the correct channels. It could be the proliferation of channels, the difference in the data sets, generic vs. complicated data models, or the fact that a great deal of online data resides at third-party providers. So, what do we do about it?
Read the full article.